authorship - Who wrote the Book of Daniel - Biblical Hermeneutics Stack ExchangeDaniel in the Lions' Den is a favorite Bible story for children. In addition, the captivating prophecy, imagery, and symbolism make the Book of Daniel one of the most read of the Old Testament of the Bible. The prophet Ezekiel, who wrote his prophecy in Babylon about the same time, mentioned three Biblical figures in a row as men of righteousness, Noah, Daniel, and Job Ezekiel and Jesus Christ referred to Daniel the Prophet Matthew Themes in the Book of Daniel include heroism, remaining true to God in the midst of an adverse and idolatrous culture, and God's protection of his faithful ones through his Angels.
Daniel, Book of
The second half of the book names as author a certain Daniel who, according to chapter 1, was exiled to Babylon. The language of the book—part of which is Aramaic — —probably indicates a date of composition later than the Babylonian Exile 6th century bc. Numerous inaccuracies connected with the exilic period no deportation occurred in bc ; Darius was a successor of Cyrus, not a predecessor; etc. Daniel, extolled for his upright character, is presented as a model for the persecuted community. The unknown author may have drawn inspiration from Ugaritic and Phoenician sources that speak of a legendary figure notable for his righteousness and wisdom.
The Book of Daniel is a 2nd-century BC biblical apocalypse combining a prophecy of history with an eschatology a portrayal of end times which is both cosmic in scope and political in its focus. The book's influence has resonated through later ages, from the Dead Sea Scrolls community and the authors of the gospels and Revelation , to various movements from the 2nd century to the Protestant Reformation and modern millennialist movements—on which it continues to have a profound influence. The Book of Daniel is divided between the court tales of chapters 1—6 and the apocalyptic visions of 7—12, and between the Hebrew of chapters 1 and 8—12 and the Aramaic of chapters 2—7. There is a clear chiasm a concentric literary structure in which the main point of a passage is placed in the centre and framed by parallel elements on either side in "ABBA" fashion in the chapter arrangement of the Aramaic section. The following is taken from Paul Redditt's "Introduction to the Prophets": .
Traditional scholarship holds that Daniel was written in the sixth century BC and is historically reliable, but many modern biblical scholars hold that Daniel was written in the second century BC and is pious fiction.
edexcel igcse human biology student book free download
VISIONS OF DANIEL
It is no accident that the three most attacked books of the Bible are also the most significant Genesis, Daniel, and Revelation. It is commonly known that if the foundation is faulty, the building will soon fall. This article will seek to refute the view that the Book of Daniel was written in the second century BC as many liberals claim and thus could not have been written by Daniel ca. This being the case, the issue of the date of Daniel will be addressed first. One of the arguments put forth which seems to indicate a late date second century BC for Daniel is its place in the canon. English versions of the Bible are based on the canonical order given in the LXX. As such, Daniel is grouped with the three major writing prophets.
The Bible has been under attack in the western world for over years but never more intensely than today. These attacks have taken different forms and have come from many different corners of the academic world, from philosophers, to scientists, to textual critics. In the specialized world of archaeology the attacks have increased dramatically in the past 50 years. Once a specialization filled with Bible believing individuals, the field of archaeology is now overrun with atheists and skeptics, agnostics and those committed to the destruction of the Bible as a source of true historical information. These attacks on the Bible are a part of a sweeping movement in western culture. Spearheaded by academic elitists in the university and the public educational system, the news and popular media, and the entertainment industry, these revisionists cloak themselves with supposed objectivity, purity of motives, and the superiority of science over the "uninformed", "unscientific", religious community. They regularly mock those who question their world-view and their conclusions by name-calling and the worst forms of anti-Bible and anti-Christian propaganda.